A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-July/015889.html below:

[Python-Dev] Silly little benchmark

[Python-Dev] Silly little benchmark [Python-Dev] Silly little benchmarkSkip Montanaro skip@pobox.com (Skip Montanaro)
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:13:16 -0500
    Tim> AFAIK, nobody did anything *except* discuss it so far.  Insert an
    Tim> early special case for sequence cat, and you slow each numeric
    Tim> addition by the time it takes to fail that test, so there's no
    Tim> killer argument either way.  int+int is special-cased by
    Tim> BINARY_ADD, but everything else goes thru the general machinery.

Hmmm... What file we talkin' about Willis?  If we did

    test for int+int
    test for string+string
    general machinery

we might speed up a couple very common cases enough to have an overall win.

Skip




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4