> so "an operation" in your original question is limited to operations that > may have resulted in an AttributeError or a TypeError depending on the > type, and the change means that they will now be more consistent? Yes. > doesn't sound too bad to me. Me neither. :-) > > I tend to fix the test suite when it tests for too specific an error. > > I don't think there are many cases in the library proper that are > > sensitive to the kind of thing that might change. > > have you made ANY changes to the library this far? Can't recall. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4