[Andrew Kuchling] > It might also be Java's development culture. Back when I occasionally > looked for Java classes, it was amazing how little free Java software > there was. People would write, say, a specialized AWT Layout class, > but instead of putting on a Web page with source code and an example, > they'd want to you pay $25 or $300 for it! This probably isn't helped > by Java support on Unixes (other than Solaris) having been so dodgy > for so long, as Unix seems to have the strongest such culture. So > people may not be accustomed to the idea that if they use Jython, they > can also *improve* it. Or maybe there's not a lot of people with core hacking attitude in the java world. How many people do know the classfile format and the jvm instruction set ? ... Or their boss does not want them to spend office time on one of the key of their company success ;) Any conspiracy theory can do the job here <wink> Nevertheless the situation is bit sad ... > BTW, I assume the Jython source uses the standard Java indentation and > formatting style? Yes and identation = 4 spaces A note: the code is a bit messy sometimes ;)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4