Tim Peters wrote: > > [Michael Hudson] > > ... > > Can anyone try this on Windows? Seeing as windows malloc > > reputedly sucks, maybe the differences would be bigger. > > No time now (pymalloc is a non-starter for 2.1). Was tried in the past on > Windows. Helped significantly. Unclear how much was simply due to > exploiting the global interpreter lock, though. "Windows" is also a > multiheaded beast (e.g., NT has very different memory performance > characteristics than 95). We're still in alpha, no ? Adding pymalloc is not much of a deal since it fits nicely with the Python malloc macros and giving the package a nice spin by putting it into a Python alpha release would sure create more confidence in this nice piece of work. We can always take it out again before going into the beta phase. Or do we have a 2.1 feature freeze already ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Company: http://www.egenix.com/ Consulting: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4