Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-January/012377.html below:

Python 2.1 slower than 2.0)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Benchmarking "fun" (was Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> In the interest of generating some numbers (and filling up my hard
> drive), last night I wrote a script to build lots & lots of versions
> of python (many of which turned out to be redundant - eg. -O6 didn't
> seem to do anything different to -O3 and pybench doesn't work with
> 1.5.2), and then run pybench with them. 

FYI, I've just updated the archive to also work under Python 1.5.x:

	http://www.lemburg.com/python/pybench-0.7.zip

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
______________________________________________________________________
Company:                                        http://www.egenix.com/
Consulting:                                    http://www.lemburg.com/
Python Pages:                           http://www.lemburg.com/python/

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Benchmarking "fun" (was Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4