> I'd be +1 on someone wrestling PEP 220 from Gordon's icy claws, > renaming it just "Generators" and filling it out for the 2.2 time > frame. If we want to address coroutines and continuations later, we > can write separate PEPs for them. I think it's better not to re-use PEP 220 for that. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4