>>>>> "NS" == Neil Schemenauer <nas@arctrix.com> writes:
NS> What's the chances of getting generators into 2.2? The
NS> implementation should not be hard. Didn't Steven Majewski
NS> have something years ago? Why do we always get sidetracked on
NS> trying to figure out how to do coroutines and continuations?
I'd be +1 on someone wrestling PEP 220 from Gordon's icy claws,
renaming it just "Generators" and filling it out for the 2.2 time
frame. If we want to address coroutines and continuations later, we
can write separate PEPs for them.
Send me a draft.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4