mal wrote:
> UnicodeMappings: 1631.65 ms 90.65 us +42.76%
> UnicodePredicates: 1762.10 ms 7.83 us +15.99%
> UnicodeProperties: 1410.80 ms 7.05 us +19.57%
> UnicodeSlicing: 1366.20 ms 7.81 us +19.23%
>
> Unicode mappings and other Unicode database related methods
> show the effect of the compression of the Unicode database -- a
> clear space/speed tradeoff.
umm. the tests don't seem to test the "\N{name}" escapes, so the
only thing that has changed in 2.1 is the "decomposition" method
(used in the UnicodeProperties test).
are you sure you're comparing against 2.0 final?
Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4