[/F, fwds a c.l.py claim that random.betavariate is dead wrong]
Not to worry; I had already entered that into the SF bug database and
assigned it to me (hmm: why would you send it to Python-Dev instead of
putting it in the database?). I suspect he's correct, and, more
importantly, so does Ivan Frohne. We'll settle it before 2.1a2, but perhaps
not today. Alas, I have no idea where the original code came from ("Guido"
isn't a useful answer -- he was just converting somebody else's C++ code to
Python).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4