On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:01:04PM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Yes, but...this hack has to work in a multithreaded environment, > > so process ID isn't good enough. And I don't want to keep a counter > > around if I don't have to. > > Sorry Eric, this just doesn't make sense. Keeping a counter around in > your module (protected by a semaphore) is obviously the right > solution. Why are you fighting it? Actually, I'm not fighting it any more. I changed my mind a few minutes after shipping that response. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/home.html">Eric S. Raymond</a>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4