Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-January/011821.html below:

[Python-Dev] new Makefile.in

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Weird use of hash() -- will this work?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: new Makefile.in
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> A question: is it possible to break the Python static library up?
> For example, instead of having libpython<version>.a have
> Parser/parser<version>.a, Objects/objects<version>.a, etc?

Please, no. It was that way in Python 1.4 (libModules, libObjects, and
I forgot which the others were :-). We had that all documented in our
book, then Guido tried to build an extension module for the first
time, saw that these many libraries were terrible, and combined them
into a single one. That was a good thing, and we have it documented in
our book. I'm not at all looking forward to answering all the
questions why the build infrastructure of Python changed yet again...

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Weird use of hash() -- will this work?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: new Makefile.in
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4