On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > >>>>> "AMK" == Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@mems-exchange.org> writes: > > AMK> On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 02:31:44PM -0500, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > >> Let's have all the interested parties vote now, then. It would > >> certainly be helpful to have the new unittest module in the alpha > >> release of 2.1. I'd like to write some new tests and I'd rather > >> use the new stuff than the old stuff. > > AMK> Huh? If no one has tried the different modules, what's the > AMK> point of having a vote? (Given that doctest is going to be > AMK> added, though, it should be checked in ASAP.) > > Guido is the only person that said he hadn't tried anything. If > others have given it a whirl, they ought to chime in now. I have used pyunit to create a simple set of tests. It seemed to do the job well and it was very easy. I'd never done it before and the docs were fat and A+. I can only give a one-sided opinion. I know of AMK's work but I have not used it, are there others? -Michel
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4