>>>>> "AMK" == Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@mems-exchange.org> writes: AMK> On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 02:31:44PM -0500, Jeremy Hylton wrote: >> Let's have all the interested parties vote now, then. It would >> certainly be helpful to have the new unittest module in the alpha >> release of 2.1. I'd like to write some new tests and I'd rather >> use the new stuff than the old stuff. AMK> Huh? If no one has tried the different modules, what's the AMK> point of having a vote? (Given that doctest is going to be AMK> added, though, it should be checked in ASAP.) Guido is the only person that said he hadn't tried anything. If others have given it a whirl, they ought to chime in now. If very few people have given them a try, we should decide whether we wait for them or proceed without them. We can't wait indefinitely. I'm not sure when we need to decide. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4