mal, finn: > >If it is too much work to get Finn's version recoded in C > >(presuming it's written in Java), then I'd suggest checking > >in your version until someone comes up with a yet smaller > >edition. > > FWIW, I agree the that 160k module should be used. Please, nobody should > use the jython compression as an argument to delay any improvements in > CPython. okay, unless someone throws in a -1 vote, I'll check this in tomorrow. Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4