Moshe Zadka wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:26:59 +0100, "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal@lemburg.com> wrote: > > > In fact I like it, that replies go to python-dev ... after all, > > that's where these things should be discussed. > > Well, that's the mailing list where things should be discussed. > But when I press the "Reply" button (as opposed to "Reply to List" button) > I expect my e-mail to go to the person originating the e-mail. > Reply-To: means "I'd like to get replies to some other address". > What if, say, a checkin message relates to some private topic > I'd discussed with someone: I'd like to reply to him personally. > > I agree that responses to Python-Checkins should be handled on Python-Dev: > that's what the mail-followup-to header is for. Ah, ok. I thought you pressed Reply-All and then wondered why your message got copied to python-dev... > > BTW, in case you misunderstood my reply: it would indeed make > > sense to automate these kinds of check (tabnanny et al). > > Oh, ok. The "cron" part threw me off (why cron?) CRON is what's used on Unix to implement jobs which run on a regular basis... perhaps we just need to seup the CRON job in timbot though ;) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Company: http://www.egenix.com/ Consulting: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4