Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-January/011640.html below:

what about the unicode name database?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] 2.1 alpha: what about the unicode name database?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] 2.1 alpha: what about the unicode name database?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> 
> The name database portions of SF task 17335 ("add
> compressed unicode database") were postponed to
> 2.1.
> 
> My current patch replaces the ~450k large ucnhash
> module with a new ~160k large module.  (See earlier
> posts for more info on how the new database works).
> 
> Should I check it in?

Since the Unicode character names are probably
not used for performance sensitive tasks, I suggest to
checkin the smallest version possible.

If it is too much work to get Finn's version recoded in C
(presuming it's written in Java), then I'd suggest checking
in your version until someone comes up with a yet smaller
edition.

Thanks,
-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
______________________________________________________________________
Company:                                        http://www.egenix.com/
Consulting:                                    http://www.lemburg.com/
Python Pages:                           http://www.lemburg.com/python/

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] 2.1 alpha: what about the unicode name database?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] 2.1 alpha: what about the unicode name database?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4