[?!ng] > [1] We started with 4. Na, *we* started with two, just ' and ". And at the time, I thought that was arguably one too many already <wink>. Allowing the modifiers to be case-insensitive seems to me much more Pythonic than the original sin of making ' and " mean the same thing. OTOH, if only " had been allowed at the start, we'd probably spell raw strings with ' today, and that doesn't really scream that they're so very different from " strings. leaving-this-one-be-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4