I've just uploaded patch 103216 to the Python project at SF. This does a couple of things. First, it auto-detects (in configure) whether dbmmodule can be built, and if so whether the -lndbm library needs to be specified. Second, it moves the entry for dbmmodule to Setup.conf, after the *shared* key so that it'll be built as a dynamic library by default. This should fix the problem where compiling in dbmmodule sets up a dependency to libdb which later hoses pybsddb3. I'd have just checked it in, but I'd like someone else to just proof it first. I've only tested this with the current CVS tree on a fairly stock RH6.1. BTW, I didn't include the changes to configure in the patch, because it's large and made SF's patch manager cough. Besides it can be generated from configure.in and config.h.in which are included in the patch. Cheers, -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4