> I would very much appreciate your feedback
At the first glance, it looks *very* promising. I really look forward
to see it in 2.1.
However, robustness probably needs to be improved:
>>> help()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: not enough arguments to help(); expected 1, got 0
Wasn't there even a proposal that
>>> help
should do something meaningful (by implementing __repr__)?
>>> import string
>>> help(string)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "pydoc.py", line 183, in help
pager('Help on %s:\n\n' % desc + textdoc.document(thing))
File "./textdoc.py", line 171, in document
if inspect.ismodule(object): results = document_module(object)
File "./textdoc.py", line 87, in document_module
if (inspect.getmodule(value) or object) is object:
File "./inspect.py", line 190, in getmodule
file = getsourcefile(object)
File "./inspect.py", line 204, in getsourcefile
filename = getfile(object)
File "./inspect.py", line 172, in getfile
raise TypeError, 'arg is a built-in class'
TypeError: arg is a built-in class
Also, the tools could use some command line options:
martin@mira:~/pydoc > ./pydoc.py --help
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./pydoc.py", line 190, in ?
opts[args[i][1:]] = args[i+1]
IndexError: list index out of range
At a minimum, I propose -h, --help, -v, -V.
Regards,
Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4