On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Tim Peters wrote: >200 chars). (BTW, I'm still curious to know how that compares to the >getc_unlocked hack on a platform other than Windows!) On Solaris and Linux, the results seemed to be lost in the noise. Repeated runs of filetest.py were sometimes faster than without USE_MS_GETLINE_HACK, so the variation is probably large enough to swamp any difference between the two. (Assuming I enabled the getline hack correctly of course; someone please replicate...) --amk Linux: w/o USE_MS_GETLINE_HACK kronos Python-2.0>./python ~/filetest.py total 1559913 chars and 32513 lines count_chars_lines 0.186 0.190 readlines_sizehint 0.108 0.110 using_fileinput 0.447 0.450 while_readline 0.184 0.180 Linux w/ USE_MS_GETLINE_HACK: kronos Python-2.0>./python ~/filetest.py total 1559913 chars and 32513 lines count_chars_lines 0.178 0.180 readlines_sizehint 0.108 0.110 using_fileinput 0.434 0.430 while_readline 0.183 0.190 Solaris w/o USE_MS_GETLINE_HACK: amarok src>./python ~/filetest.py total 1559913 chars and 32513 lines count_chars_lines 0.640 0.630 readlines_sizehint 0.278 0.280 using_fileinput 1.874 1.820 while_readline 0.839 0.840 Solaris w/ USE_MS_GETLINE_HACK: amarok src>./python ~/filetest.py total 1559913 chars and 32513 lines count_chars_lines 0.569 0.570 readlines_sizehint 0.275 0.280 using_fileinput 1.902 1.900 while_readline 0.769 0.770
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4