On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:27:50AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > You may be right. Still, this patch solves the immediate problem in a > > reasonably clean way, and I urge that it should go in. We can do a > > more complete reorganization of the build process later. (I'll help with > > that; I'm pretty expert with autoconf and friends.) > I expect Andrew's code to go in before 2.1 is released. So I don't > see a reason why we should hurry and check in a stop-gap measure. Oh, we're gonna distribute binaries of Python 2.0/1.5.2-with-distutils for every known platform that can run configure ? :) I still think there are more than enough platforms without Python to warrant using autoconf for configuring modules. The module list and their demands are stable enough to make maintenance a fair breeze, IMHO. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4