On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:27:50AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: >I expect Andrew's code to go in before 2.1 is released. So I don't >see a reason why we should hurry and check in a stop-gap measure. But it might not; the final version might be unacceptable or run into some intractable problem. Assuming the patch is correct (I haven't looked at it), why not check it in? The work has already been done to write it, after all. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4