Ping> Sorry to bother you if you're busy -- i haven't seen any responses
Ping> about inspect.py for a few days and wanted to know what your
Ping> reactions were.
Fiddling code bits is not the sort of stuff I do very often, but every time
I do I wind up having to reacquaint myself with all sorts of object details
that slip out of my brain shortly after the latest need is gone. Having a
module that hides the details seems like a good idea to me.
+1. I vote it go into 2.1 assuming a bit for the library reference can be
written in time.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4