On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 03:35:27PM -0500, Andrew Kuchling wrote: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 02:49:24PM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >But I would be very hesitant to drop the notion of maintaining the FAQ > >as a group collaboration project. There's nothing wrong with the FAQ > >wizard except that the password (Spam) should be made publicly known... > > Why multiply the number of mechanisms required to maintain things? We > already use CVS for other documentation; why not use it for the FAQ as > well? That would limit the updaters to just those with CVS access. As Guido just pointed out, Bjorn made a bunch of updates. And he didn't need CVS to do that... Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4