[Martin v. Loewis] > ... > If you think this should be written down in a PEP, Yes. > I'd request that the specification above is added into PEP 236. No -- PEP 236 is not a general directive PEP, no matter how much that what you *want* is a general directive PEP. I'll add a Q/A pair to 236 about why it's not a general directive PEP, but that's it. PEP 236 stands on its own for what it's designed for; your PEP should stand on its own for what *it's* designed for (which isn't nested_scopes et alia, it's character encodings). (BTW, there is no patch attached to patch 404997 -- see other recent msgs about people having problems uploading files to SF; maybe you could just put a patch URL in a comment now?]
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4