Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-February/013200.html below:

[Python-Dev] GC and Vladimir's obmalloc

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] GC and Vladimir's obmalloc
• Next message: [Python-Dev] GC and Vladimir's obmalloc
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:46:59AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Executive Summary: obmalloc will allow more efficient GC and we
> > should try hard to get it into 2.1.
> 
> Can you do it before the 2.1b1 release?  We're planning that for this
> Thursday, May 1st.  Three days!

What has to be done besides applying the patch and adding a
configure option?  I can do that tonight if you give the green
light.

> > Is the only issue with obmalloc treading? If so, what do we do to
> > resolve this?  
> 
> 1. Yes, I think so.  2. It currently relies on the global interpreter
> lock.  That's why we want to make it an opt-in configuration option
> (for now).  Does that work with your proposed GC integration?

Opt-in is fine for now.  

  Neil

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] GC and Vladimir's obmalloc
• Next message: [Python-Dev] GC and Vladimir's obmalloc
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4