> Hi. > > I'm really glad that the holy war has come to an end, and that a technical > solution has been found. Not as glad as I am, Samuele! > This was my first debate here and I have said few wise things, more stupid > ones and some violent or unfair: my excuses go to Jeremy, Guido > and the biz mind (in some of us) that make money out of software > (nobody can predict how he will make his living ;)) It wasn't my first debate (:-), but I feel the same way! > I'm glad that we have nested scopes, a transition syntax and path > and no new keyword (no irony in the latter). Me too. > Cheers, Samuele. Hope to hear from you more, Samuele! How's the Jython port of nested scopes coming? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4