Thomas wrote: > Okay, I can live with that, but can we please have at least one release > between "these are cool features and we use them in the std. library > ourselves" and "no no you bad boy!" ? Or fork Python 3.0, move nested > scopes to that, and release it parallel to 2.1 ? hey, that would mean that we can once again release two versions on the same day! (or why not three: 1.6.1, 2.1, and 3.0! ;-) Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4