Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> I don't recall seeing any substanital discussion of this PEP on
> python-dev or python-list, nor do I recall a BDFL decision on the
> PEP. There has been lots of discussion about backwards compatibility,
> but not much consensus.
Really? If that's the case, maybe someone should move it
to the "future" or "pie-in-the-sky" section, and mark it as
"draft" instead of "active"?
:::
...and if stepwise deprecation isn't that important, why
did a certain BDFL bother to implement a warning frame-
work for 2.1?
http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0230.html
Looks like the perfect tool for this task. Why not use it?
:::
Is it time to shut down python-dev? (yes, I'm serious)
Annoyed /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4