>>>>> "SP" == Samuele Pedroni <pedroni@inf.ethz.ch> writes: SP> My very personal feeling is that *any* rule on exec just sounds SP> arbitrary (even if motived and acceptable). My personal feeling is that exec is used rarely enough that a few restrictions on its use is not a problem. The restriction can be fairly minimal -- "exec" without "in" is not allowed in a function that contains nested blocks with free variables. Heck, we would just outlaw all uses of exec without in <0.5 wink>. I would argue for this rule in Python 3000, but it would break a lot more code than the restriction proposed above. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4