Hi. So few code breakage is nice. [Jeremy Hilton] > I also realized that the exec rule is still too string. If the exec > statement passes an explicit namespace -- "exec in foo" -- then there > shouldn't be any problem, because the executed code can't affect the > current namespace. If this form is allowed, the exec errors in xpcom > and Zope disappear. My very personal feeling is that *any* rule on exec just sounds arbitrary (even if motived and acceptable). regards, Samuele Pedroni.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4