> FL> doesn't sound like it really belongs in a X.1 release... > > So if we called the next release Python 3.0, it would be okay? yes. (but in case you do, I'm pretty sure someone else will release a 2.1 consisting of 2.0 plus all 2.0-compatible parts from 3.0) Cheers /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4