> Even at the cost of additional implementation complexity? I can only assume you are serious. IMO, absolutely! > Let's not waffle. Agreed. IMO we are starting to waffle the minute we ignore backwards compatibility. If a new feature can't be added without breaking code that was not previously documented as illegal, then IMO it is simply a non-starter until Py3k. Indeed, I seem to recall many worthwhile features being added to the Py3k bit-bucket for exactly that reason. Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4