--sM/l4IEZEs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: message body text Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FYI, for those of you who don't read c.l.py on a regular basis. Skip --sM/l4IEZEs Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Description: forwarded message Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Digest: Python-list digest, Vol 1 #4869 - 11 msgs Message: 3 Message-ID: <20010216093538.E7411@freedom.puma-ag.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Purcell <stephen_purcell@yahoo.com>, python-list@python.org References: <977A39E65CFCD3119ABF00D0B741D849E0FEF2@innt-73.ata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <977A39E65CFCD3119ABF00D0B741D849E0FEF2@innt-73.ata.com>; from Jerry.Spicklemire@IFLYATA.COM on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 05:09:20PM -0500 Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org> List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> From: Steve Purcell <stephen_purcell@yahoo.com> Sender: python-list-admin@python.org To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Upgrade? Not for some time... Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:35:38 +0100 Spicklemire, Jerry wrote: > Mark Hudson asked? > "Have you upgraded to Python 2.0?" I'm still using 1.5.2, with no plans to upgrade. My reasons: 1. Python 1.5.2 and all its juicy C extensions (PIL, PyGreSQL etc) are officially supported with binary packages on Linux and elsewhere. Python 2.0 will probably not make its way into the core of any big Linux distros for quite a few months. No source installs of Python + extensions for me. 2. Until I feel like only cavemen are still using 1.5.2, I'll avoid using 2.0 in case I end up writing funky code with list comprehensions that nobody can use. 3. With the current rate of releases and core python development, I'll save the effort of upgrading until 2.1 (or whatever) becomes the '1.5.2' of the future! Makes me think of Java's JDK 1.3 -- why bother? I haven't needed most of JDK 1.2 yet, and at least *everyone* has that version. For that matter, some people are still starting new projects using JDK 1.1, and Java 1.0 is the only serious choice for applets. I hope Python doesn't go the same way. -Caveman Steve -- Steve Purcell, Pythangelist Get testing at http://pyunit.sourceforge.net/ Get servlets at http://pyserv.sourceforge.net/ "Even snakes are afraid of snakes." -- Steven Wright --sM/l4IEZEs--
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4