> Michael Hudson wrote: > > > > The use > > of Vladimir Marangoz's obmalloc patch in some of the benchmarks > > sparked a discussion about whether this patch should be incorporated > > into Python 2.1. There was support from many for adding it on an > > opt-in basis, since when nothing has happened... > > ... I'm still waiting on BDFL pronouncement on this one. The plan > was to check it in for beta1 on an opt-in basis (Vladimir has written > the patch this way). > > -- > Marc-Andre Lemburg If it is truly opt-in (supposedly a configure option?), I'm all for it. I recall vaguely though that Jeremy or Tim thought that the patch touches lots of code even when one doesn't opt in. That was a no-no so close before the a2 release. Anybody who actually looked at the code got an opinion on that now? The b1 release is planned for March 1st, or exactly two weeks! --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4