Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > > Cute: Python changed the first line of its traceback output (used to say > > "Traceback (innermost last):"), and current doctest wasn't expecting that. > > which reminds me... are there any chance of getting a doctest > that can survives its own test suite under 1.5.2, 2.0, and 2.1? > > the latest version blows up under 1.5.2 and 2.0: > > ***************************************************************** > Failure in example: 1/0 > from line #155 of doctest > Expected: ZeroDivisionError: integer division or modulo by zero > Got: ZeroDivisionError: integer division or modulo > 1 items had failures: > 1 of 8 in doctest > ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. Since exception message are not defined anywhere I'd suggest to simply ignore them in the output. About the traceback output format: how about adding some re support instead of using string.find() ?! -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Company: http://www.egenix.com/ Consulting: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4