>>>>> "FL" == Fredrik Lundh <fredrik@pythonware.com> writes: >> > After the first exception, something is broken and needs to be >> > fixed, regardless of whether subsequent lines of code work. >> FL> jeremy, that's the kind of comment I would have expected from a FL> manager, not from a programmer who has done lots of testing. >> >> I don't think there's any reason to be snide. FL> Well, I first wrote "taken out of context, that's the kind of FL> comment" but then I noticed that it wasn't really taken out of FL> context. FL> And in full context, it still looks a bit arrogant: why would FL> Andrew raise this issue if *he* didn't want more granularity? I hope it's simple disagreement and not arrogance. I do not agree with him (or you) on a particular technical issue -- whether particular expressions should be stuffed into string literals in order to recover from exceptions they raise. There's a tradeoff between readability and granularity and I prefer readability. I am surprised that you are impugning my technical abilities (manager, not programmer) or calling me arrogant because I don't agree. I think I am should be entitled to my wrong opinion. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4