Jeremy Hylton wrote: > >>>>> "GvR" == Guido van Rossum <guido@digicool.com> writes: > > [Andrew writes:] > >> I'd really like to have unit testing in 2.1 that I can actually > >> use. PyUnit as it stands is clunky enough that I'd still use the > >> Quixote framework in my code; the advantage of being included > >> with Python would not overcome its disadvantages for me. Have > >> you got a list of desired changes? And should the changes be > >> discussed on python-dev or the PyUnit list? > > GvR> I'm just reporting what I've heard on our group meetings. Fred > GvR> Drake and Jeremy Hylton are in charge of getting this done. > GvR> You can catch their ear on python-dev; I'm not sure about the > GvR> PyUnit list. > > I'm happy to discuss on either venue, or to hash it in private email. > What specific features do you need? Perhaps Steve will be interested > in including them in PyUnit. Fine by private e-mail, though it would be nice if some of the discussions are seen by the PyUnit list because it's a representative community of regular users who probably have a good idea of what makes sense for them. If somebody would like to suggest changes, I can look into how they might get done. Also, I'd love to see what I can do to allay AMK's 'clunkiness' complaints! :-) Best wishes, -Steve -- Steve Purcell, Pythangelist "Life must be simple if *I* can do it" -- me
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4