> Availability of Linux binaries is certainly an issue. On xml-sig, one > Linux distributor (I forgot whether SuSE or Redhat) mentioned that > they won't include 2.0 in their current major release series (7.x for > both). 'Twas Red Hat. However, others claim to have spotted Python 2.0 in Rawhide and supposedly both versions might be included until 8.0. > In addition, many packages are still not available for 2.0. Zope is > only one of them; gtk, Qt, etc packages are still struggling with > Unicode support. omniORBpy has #include <python15/Python.h> in their > sources, I hadn't noticed this. OmniORBpy compiles and runs just fine for me using Python 2.0 and 2.1a2, except that it throws BAD_PARAM when passed Unicode objects in place of strings. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4