Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-February/012712.html below:

for in dict (user expectation poll)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] re: for in dict (user expectation poll)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Fw: list.index(..) -> TypeError bug or feature?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:39:15PM -0600, Skip Montanaro wrote:

>     Thomas> for x in 0 .. sequence:

> You meant

>     for x in 0 .. len(sequence):

> right?

Yes and no. Yes, I know '0 .. sequence' can't really work. But that doesn't
mean I don't think the one without len() might be pref'rble over the other
one :) They were all just examples, anyway. All this talk about syntax and
what is best makes me feel like Fredrik: old and grumpy <wink>.

Time-for-my-medication-;)-ly y'rs,
-- 
Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] re: for in dict (user expectation poll)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Fw: list.index(..) -> TypeError bug or feature?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4