> Greg Wilson wrote: > > > > I've spoken with Barbara Fuller (IPC9 org.); the two openings for a > > BOF on sets are breakfast or lunch on Wednesday the 7th. I'd prefer > > breakfast (less chance of me missing my flight :-); is there anyone > > who's interested in attending who *can't* make that time, but *could* > > make lunch? [MAL] > Depends on the time frame of "breakfast" ;-) Does this mean you'll be at the conference? That would be excellent! > Two things: > > 1. the proposed syntax key:value does away with the > easy to parse Python block statement syntax > > 2. why can't we use the old 'for x,y,z in something:' syntax > and instead add iterators to the objects in question ? > > for key, value in object.iterator(): > ... > > this doesn't only look better, it also allows having different > iterators for different tasks (e.g. to iterate over values, key, > items, row in a matrix, etc.) This should become the PEP. I propose that we try to keep this discussion off python-dev, and that the PEP author(s?) set up a separate discussion list (e.g. at egroups) to keep the PEP feedback coming. I promise I'll subscribe to such a list. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4