[MAL] > Looks like Jeremy's machine has a problem or this is the result > of different compiler optimizations. Are you using an AMD chip? They have different cache behavior than the Pentium I expect Jeremy is using. Different flavors of Pentium also have different cache behavior. If the slowdown his box reports in insertdict is real (which I don't know), cache effects are the most likely cause (given that the code has not changed at all). > On my machine using the same compiler and optimization settings > I get the following figure for DictCreation (2.1a1 vs. 2.0): > > DictCreation: 1869.35 ms 12.46 us +8.77% > > That's below noise level (+/-10%). Jeremy saw "about 15%". So maybe that's just *loud* noise <wink>. noise-should-be-measured-in-decibels-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4