[Barry A. Warsaw] > And thank goodness for Un*x, where I get to ignore all the 69 > different varieties of The One True Operating System -- all Windows > OSes are created equal, right? :) Yes, and every one of them perfect, albeit each in its own unique way <wink>. I wouldn't wish it on anyone, but, in the end, even you would have rather done the Win64 port from scratch than try to close the HPUX bugs still open. Heh heh. > Even a Un*x dweeb like myself would agree, if you have to change one > of them, change the executable. I see no reason why on Un*x the build > procedure couldn't drop a symlink from python.exe to python for > backwards compatibility and convenience. Of course I wasn't serious about that. To judge from a decade of Unix-newbie postings to c.l.py, we should rename the executable there to phyton. That's what they think the language is named anyway. always-eager-to-aid-my-unixoid-brethren-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4