A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-February/012470.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding pymalloc to the core (Benchmarking "fun" (was Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0))

[Python-Dev] Adding pymalloc to the core (Benchmarking "fun" (was Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0)) [Python-Dev] Adding pymalloc to the core (Benchmarking "fun" (was Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0))M.-A. Lemburg mal@lemburg.com
Fri, 02 Feb 2001 14:58:05 +0100
Moshe Zadka wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:14:33 +0100, "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal@lemburg.com> wrote:
> 
> > Anyone else for adding it now on an opt-in basis ?
> 
> Add it on opt-out basis, and if it causes trouble, revert to opt-in
> in beta/final. Alphas are supposed to be buggy <0.7 wink>

Ok, that makes +5 on including it, no negative response so far.

We'll only have to sort out whether to make it opt-in (the
current state of the patch) or opt-out. The latter would
certainly enable better testing of the code, but I understand
that Jeremy doesn't want to destabilize the release just now.

Perhaps we'll need a third alpha release ?! (the weak reference
implementation and the other goodies need much more testing IMHO
than just one alpha cycle)

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
______________________________________________________________________
Company:                                        http://www.egenix.com/
Consulting:                                    http://www.lemburg.com/
Python Pages:                           http://www.lemburg.com/python/



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4