Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:24:32PM +0000, Michael Hudson wrote:
>
> > > Anyone else for adding [pyobjmalloc] now on an opt-in basis ?
>
> > Yes. I also want to try adding it in and then scrapping the free list
> > management done by ints, frames, etc. and seeing if it this results in
> > any significant slowdown. Don't have time for another mega-benchmark
> > just now though.
>
> We could (and probably should) delay that for 2.2 anyway.
Uhh, yes. I meant to say that too. Must remember to finish my
posts...
> Make pymalloc default on, and do some standardized benchmarking on a
> number of different platforms, with and without the typespecific
> freelists.
Yes. This will take time, but is worthwhile, IMHO.
Cheers,
M.
--
C is not clean -- the language has _many_ gotchas and traps, and
although its semantics are _simple_ in some sense, it is not any
cleaner than the assembly-language design it is based on.
-- Erik Naggum, comp.lang.lisp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4