A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-February/012464.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding pymalloc to the core (Benchmarking "fun" (was Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0))

[Python-Dev] Adding pymalloc to the core (Benchmarking "fun" (was Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0)) [Python-Dev] Adding pymalloc to the core (Benchmarking "fun" (was Re: Python 2.1 slower than 2.0))Thomas Wouters thomas@xs4all.net
Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:29:53 +0100
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:24:32PM +0000, Michael Hudson wrote:

> > Anyone else for adding [pyobjmalloc] now on an opt-in basis ?

> Yes.  I also want to try adding it in and then scrapping the free list
> management done by ints, frames, etc. and seeing if it this results in
> any significant slowdown.  Don't have time for another mega-benchmark
> just now though.

We could (and probably should) delay that for 2.2 anyway. Make pymalloc
default on, and do some standardized benchmarking on a number of different
platforms, with and without the typespecific freelists.

-- 
Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4