On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:21:30AM -0500, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > I run the regression test a lot. I have found that it is often useful > to exclude some of the slowest tests for most of the test runs and > then do a full test run before I commit changes. Would anyone be > opposed to a quicktest target in the Makefile that supports this > practice? There are a small number of tests that each take at least > 10 seconds to complete. Definately +1 here. On BSDI 4.0, which I try to test regularly, test_signal hangs (because of threading bugs in BSDI, nothing Python can solve) and test_select/test_poll either crash right away, or hang as well (same as with test_signal, but could be specific to the box I'm running it on.) So I've been forced to do it by hand. I'm not sure why I didn't automate it yet, but make quicktest would be very welcome :) > + QUICKTESTOPTS= $(TESTOPTS) -x test_thread test_signal test_strftime \ > + test_unicodedata test_re test_sre test_select test_poll -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4