A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-February/012440.html below:

[Python-Dev] any opinion on 'make quicktest'?

[Python-Dev] any opinion on 'make quicktest'? [Python-Dev] any opinion on 'make quicktest'?Barry A. Warsaw barry@digicool.com
Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:22:38 -0500
>>>>> "JH" == Jeremy Hylton <jeremy@alum.mit.edu> writes:

    JH> I run the regression test a lot.  I have found that it is
    JH> often useful to exclude some of the slowest tests for most of
    JH> the test runs and then do a full test run before I commit
    JH> changes.  Would anyone be opposed to a quicktest target in the
    JH> Makefile that supports this practice?  There are a small
    JH> number of tests that each take at least 10 seconds to
    JH> complete.

I'm strongly +1 on this, because I often run the test suite on an
Insure'd executable.  It takes a looonngg time for even the quick
tests.

-Barry



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4