Tim Peters writes: > -0. When we turn on pymalloc in 2.3, blocks will get allocated by magic, > and more space-efficiently than you're going to do by hand (it bites one > malloc overhead per 256KB). pymalloc will likely be a little slower than a That's good enough for me! I'll look forward to ripping the free list out completely. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4