>>> Aahz Maruch wrote > What does "should be maintained" mean? With CVS, IIUC, there's no > reason not to keep branches around forever. If instead what you're I mean "should continually have backported patches applied". > talking about is policy for work to be assigned, I won't let that into > PEP6; the entire point of PEP6 is that it only prescribes procedure for > someone who is already working, it does not specify any work to be > accomplished in the abstract. Oh, sure - I'm not talking about adding it to PEP006 - it's not appropriate for it. More talking about the abstract here. > The problem lies in creating the social structure to make that happen. > People who monitor CVS need to get into the habit of reminding each > other to mark bugfix candidates. But that's beyond the scope of PEP6. *nod* absolutely.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4